Search
Use the search bar or filters below to find any TAPPI product or publication.
Filters
Publications
Level of Knowledge
Collections
Journal articles
Magazine articles
SetPoint: Who’s on First? What’s on Second?, Paper360º September/October 2019
SetPoint: Who’s on First? What’s on Second?, Paper360º September/October 2019
Journal articles
Magazine articles
TAPPI Nano 2019: Focus on New Markets, Paper360º September/October 2019
TAPPI Nano 2019: Focus on New Markets, Paper360º September/October 2019
Journal articles
Magazine articles
To Canfor, Pulp is Much More than a Commodity, Paper360º September/October 2019
To Canfor, Pulp is Much More than a Commodity, Paper360º September/October 2019
Journal articles
Magazine articles
Sofidel Opens a Showcase in Circleville, Tissue360º Spring/Summer 2019
Sofidel Opens a Showcase in Circleville, Tissue360º Spring/Summer 2019
Journal articles
Magazine articles
A Strong Family Business Perseveres, Tissue360º Spring/Summer 2019
A Strong Family Business Perseveres, Tissue360º Spring/Summer 2019
Journal articles
Magazine articles
Standards
On-machine visible dirt measurement on moving sheets and the relationships to standard laboratory methods, TAPPI Journal August 2020
ABSTRACT: There has been a proliferation of new sensors to measure on-machine dirt specks that employ different technologies and methodologies to perform measurements. The differences in the on-machine technologies are discussed in terms of the TAPPI and ISO standard laboratory test methods with respect to dirt detection using light reflected from, or light transmitted through, the sheet. Also discussed are the requirements for measuring sta-tistically representative areas of the sheet; the difference between the dirt physical size and Equivalent Black Area (EBA) size; and the implication of these issues when specifying cleanliness acceptance criteria.This technical brief describes on-machine visible dirt measurement’s relationship to standard laboratory testing.
Journal articles
Magazine articles
Standards
Relating bending stiffness measurements across various free span lengths, TAPPI Journal August 2020
ABSTRACT: Bending stiffness should be an intrinsic property of a material, so it is puzzling that the TAPPI Standard Test Method T 836 “Bending stiffness, four point method” specifies span lengths when testing different types of corrugated fiberboard. These specified spans often limit the samples that can be measured with this method. To better understand the relationship between bending stiffness and span length, we performed measurements on a range of materials at different spans. The results provide a practical tool enabling comparison of bending stiffness measurements made at various span lengths. Additionally, this note discusses several areas that could serve as the foundation for more fundamental work exploring the bending behavior of corrugated board.
Journal articles
Magazine articles
SetPoint: Paper People, Paper360º November/December 2016
SetPoint: Paper People, Paper360º November/December 2016
Journal articles
Magazine articles
Editorial: Impacts from using recycled pizza boxes in furnish: TAPPI Journal’s runner-up to 2021 Best Research Paper, TAPPI Journal August 2022
ABSTRACT: The runner-up to the 2021 TAPPI Journal Best Research Paper was “Incorporation of post-consumer pizza boxes in the recover Fiber Stream: Impact of grease on finished product quality."
Journal articles
Magazine articles
Edge crush testing methods and box compression modeling, TAPPI Journal August 2022
ABSTRACT: While multiple test procedures have been developed to assess the inherent compressive strength of corrugated materials (edge crush test, ECT), limited work has explored the appropriateness of each in the context of box compression modeling. This study incorporates a variety of real-world samples, highlighting the varying challenges different ECT methods face in measuring the intrinsic compressive resistance of combined corrugated board. We examine each of these methods as inputs for different types of models, as well as discuss the propagation of measurement variation through the modeling effort. By highlighting the cases in which a given ECT method no longer proves to be an optimal parameter in box compression strength modeling, we explore how we might better measure this material property.