Search
Use the search bar or filters below to find any TAPPI product or publication.
Filters
Content Type
Publications
Level of Knowledge
Committees
Collections
Magazine articles
Shop talk: concerning coefficient of friction, TAPPI JOURNAL, June 2000, Vol. 83(6)
Shop talk: concerning coefficient of friction, TAPPI JOURNAL, June 2000, Vol. 83(6)
Magazine articles
The role of the production manager, TAPPI JOURNAL, November 1996, Vol. 79(11)
The role of the production manager, TAPPI JOURNAL, November 1996, Vol. 79(11)
Magazine articles
1995 TAPPI/FBI corrugated productivity survey, TAPPI JOURNAL, November 1996, Vol. 79(11)
1995 TAPPI/FBI corrugated productivity survey, TAPPI JOURNAL, November 1996, Vol. 79(11)
Magazine articles
1995 looks good for corrugated and solid-fiber box production and folding paperboard boxes, TAPPI JOURNAL, April 1995, Vol. 78(4)
1995 looks good for corrugated and solid-fiber box production and folding paperboard boxes, TAPPI JOURNAL, April 1995, Vol. 78(4)
Magazine articles
A sneak preview of the box plant of the year 2000, TAPPI JOURNAL, October 1992, Vol. 75(10)
A sneak preview of the box plant of the year 2000, TAPPI JOURNAL, October 1992, Vol. 75(10)
Journal articles
Magazine articles
Importance of specimen preparation for edgewise compressive strength (ECT) testing, TAPPI JOURNAL April 2018
Importance of specimen preparation for edgewise compressive strength (ECT) testing, TAPPI JOURNAL April 2018
Journal articles
Magazine articles
Evaluating hardness and the S-test, TAPPI Journal March 2019
ABSTRACT: The corrugated industry typically quantifies crush resistance using the Concora corrugated medium test (CMT) on fluted medium or flat crush on combined board. These tests compress the materials until the point of complete failure of the flutes. Combined board elastically resists crushing forces until a certain point, the hardness of the structure, while additional load causes permanent damage and deformation. This study investigates how hardness can be measured directly from a load curve collected during CMT (or flat crush) testing and how it varies throughout the North American paper supply. It also explores how hardness corre-lates with the values obtained from the newly developed S-test. This new test method deserves further study as a potentially more appropriate specification for crush resistance of corrugated medium.
Journal articles
Magazine articles
Historical perspectives of corrugated box testing for 2020, TAPPI Journal March 2020
ABSTRACT: In the age of e-commerce, corrugated packaging is experiencing a resurgence; at least, consumers are receiving more corrugated boxes today than ever before. The corrugated box has been the main package for transporting goods for over 100 years, and corrugated board and boxes have been the focus of scientific study for about as long. For the last 50 years, box compressive test strength value (BCT) has been the main focus of research and testing. That was not always the case. In addition, many of today’s boxes experience a different end-use life than their predecessors.
Journal articles
Magazine articles
Edge crush testing methods and box compression modeling, TAPPI Journal August 2022
ABSTRACT: While multiple test procedures have been developed to assess the inherent compressive strength of corrugated materials (edge crush test, ECT), limited work has explored the appropriateness of each in the context of box compression modeling. This study incorporates a variety of real-world samples, highlighting the varying challenges different ECT methods face in measuring the intrinsic compressive resistance of combined corrugated board. We examine each of these methods as inputs for different types of models, as well as discuss the propagation of measurement variation through the modeling effort. By highlighting the cases in which a given ECT method no longer proves to be an optimal parameter in box compression strength modeling, we explore how we might better measure this material property.
Journal articles
Magazine articles
Assessing variation in package modeling, TAPPI Journal April 2021
ABSTRACT: Predictions from empirical models are affected by variability in the input parameters for the data set used to build the models. For corrugated boxes, the difference between actual and modeled compression strength creates a real cost associated with box production, often resulting in boxes that may need to be over-designed to compensate for a lack of model precision. No work to date has attempted to assess the limitation in these compression estimates due to input parameter testing variability. In this paper we approach that problem, initially for the McKee equation and then conceptually for other box models. For our industry to do a better job at meeting the needs of our corrugated packaging customers, we need to reduce the variation in the tests we all rely on, particularly for evaluating material strength (edge crush test [ECT]) and package compression performance (box compression test [BCT]).